![like a thief in the night bible verse like a thief in the night bible verse](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/03/00/a6/0300a6d13efff315944ce1aa5a03ec98.jpg)
All he deals with is just one side of that coming, namely, what’s going to happen to the world when Jesus comes. But after that verse, the second coming is never mentioned again, even though that seemed to be the issue.
![like a thief in the night bible verse like a thief in the night bible verse](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/46/6e/69/466e69d2f1ed51fee476def6f69d517e.png)
Now, what I mean by a one-sided view of the end is this: the whole discussion of the end or the second coming gets started in 2 Peter 3:4 with the promise of his coming or with the scoffers denying his coming. Now, I think the fact that Peter is still addressing that issue - that teaching - accounts for why he gives us such a one-sided view of the end of the age here in these verses. Just What the False Teachers Need to Hear And this thought of an inbreaking of the Son of God and a transformation of this created order is out of the question. It’s just unbelievable - unimaginable - that that should be the case because for thousands and thousands of years the world has gone on just the way it did from the beginning. In other words, the false teachers basically rejected the reality of the second coming, because - among other reasons - the traditional teaching that with the coming of the Lord there would be a kind of world-transforming upheaval is so unlikely. The false teaching you remember most recently came to expression in 2 Peter 3:4, and there they had their say and what they said was, “Where is the promise of his coming? For ever since the fathers fell asleep, all things are continuing as they were from the beginning of creation.” Now, in order to understand 2 Peter 3:10–14, I think we need to keep in mind that still Peter has in view this false teaching that we have been encountering week after week in these verses.